Us gay bomb

Home / gay topics / Us gay bomb

In a variation on that idea, researchers pondered a "Who? The weapon would use strong aphrodisiacs to make enemy troops so sexually attracted to each other that they'd lose interest in fighting.

Last year, scientists at Boston University developed brain implants that could steer sharklike dog fish with a phantom odor.

Just three years ago, the military funded a specious study of psychic teleportation, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

Scientists also reportedly considered a "sting me/attack me" chemical weapon to attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats towards enemy troops.

A substance to make the skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight was also pondered. An 88-page report prepared by the Air Force Research Lab contended that moving through mind powers is "quite real and can be controlled."

"The military has a lot of crazy ideas," said Noah Shactman, editor of the Wired blog Danger Room.

Captain Dan McSweeney of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate at the Pentagon said the defence department receives "literally hundreds" of project ideas, but that "none of the systems described in that [1994] proposal have been developed". Stimulating the brain to suppress sleep for days. Me?" bomb, which would simulate flatulence in enemy ranks.

Although the idea never advanced beyond the planning stage, it revealed troubling assumptions embedded in military policy at the time, particularly during the era of “Don't Ask, Don't Tell.” This account examines how the proposal surfaced through freedom-of-information requests, why it was ultimately unworkable, how it became a target of satire and conspiracy theories, and how it reflects a broader history of discrimination against LGBTQ service members across decades of U.S.

military practice.

More for You

JFK's niece has message for man who bought Trump-Kennedy Center domain

FBI releases images of seized motorcycles as search for Ryan Wedding continues

Broncos 'ugly' shirts for winning AFC West left Sean Payton, players perplexed

French split over Brigitte Bardot tribute due to her far right views

Scientists discover a lemon-shaped planet with something they've never seen before

This 18-mile stretch of road could be the future for highways

Who is Sarah West?

Another idea was to develop a chemical causing "severe and lasting halitosis", so that enemy forces would be obvious even when they tried to blend in with civilians. Me?'

The plan for a so-called "love bomb" envisaged an aphrodisiac chemical that would provoke widespread homosexual behaviour among troops, causing what the military called a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale.

'Who?

us gay bomb

Other weapons that never saw the light of day include one to make soldiers obvious by their bad breath. But some fringe research mimics the best of science fiction.

There seems to be no failure of imagination in advancing warfare, but some experts fear these farfetched projects show a little too much imagination.

Just this month, the government confirmed that an Ohio Air Force laboratory had asked for $7.5 million to build a nonlethal "gay bomb," a weapon that would encourage enemies to make love, not war.

He told the BBC: "It's important to point out that only those proposals which are deemed appropriate, based on stringent human effects, legal, and international treaty reviews are considered for development or acquisition."

Fringe Science Yields 'Gay Bombs' and Psychic Teleportation

June 21, 2007 — -- Creating armor that renders a soldier invisible.

Judge faces calls to be fired over Minnesota fraud case

4 paint colors designers say will be out of style in 2026

Ground beef recalled in 6 states over possible E coli contamination

Is significant snow in store for the East Coast after New Year's?

Trump tears up Obama-era Latin American policy with renewal of Monroe Doctrine

What a new California law means for tortillas

Mom pleads for help after teen "lost respect" for her over Taylor Swift

Mics caught Travis Kelce’s classy message to Bo Nix in possibly last Chiefs home game

Trump: US made Christmas Eve strike on Venezuela facility

Travis Kelce reveals how Taylor Swift’s sourdough obsession inspired his best gift to her

How Social Security has gotten worse under Trump

Bing Crosby's grandson describes time Dean Martin crunched his luxury car in a McDonald's drive-thru

Tyler Perry's accuser sent messages of gratitude and friendship years after alleged assault

New super flu variant: What doctors want you to know

.

The US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals".

The plans were obtained under the US Freedom of Information by the Sunshine Project, a group which monitors research into chemical and biological weapons. Arming sharks with chemical implants and cameras to work as spies.

This year the Pentagon will spend $78 billion — about half of all government research and development dollars — on a variety of projects, according to the American Association for the Advancement for Science (AAAS).

The vast majority - about $68 billion - goes to traditional spending, like weapons development and space systems.

"There is the risk that agencies starved of funding will invest in schemes that promise high payoff, but aren't a sound investment," she added.



Sponsored Content by Taboola

How the Pentagon Wanted to Make a "Gay Bomb"

Megaprojects

Posted: November 20, 2025 | Last updated: November 20, 2025

An in-depth exploration of the so-called gay bomb, a real proposal submitted by a U.S.

Air Force laboratory in the 1990s that aimed to incapacitate enemy forces by inducing homosexual attraction through an aerosolized chemical agent. "But it's hard to turn these ideas into action."

In her book "Imaginary Weapons," military expert Sharon Weinberger writes that the federal government is spending taxpayer money on war technology at a pace of about $50,000 per second.

"If you don't support long-term investment in funding risky science and technology, you won't get breakthroughs," Weinberger told ABC News.

But investing in wacky weaponry can also have the opposite effect.

"There is more pressure to fund fringy things, much the same way a bankrupted person will be tempted to play the lottery," said Weinberger.